The Honest Answer First

Check SIM Owner Name by Mobile Number (2026) — Why No Legal Pakistani Tool Does This, and What You Can Actually Check

There is no legal, public tool in Pakistan that lets you type in a stranger’s mobile number and get back their name, address, or CNIC — not an SMS shortcode, not a website, not an app, and not cnic.sims.pk. Every option that legally exists in this country either checks the SIM in your own hand (like the 667 MNP code) or tells you a number’s current network only (like 76367). If a site, app, or WhatsApp bot promises “sim owner name by mobile number,” it is either lying, scraping old leaked data, or breaking the law — and using it can make you legally liable too, under Section 16 of the Pakistan Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) 2016. This page explains, precisely and without hedging, what each real tool shows, why the “owner name” apps fail, what the law actually allows, and what to do instead if someone is bothering you from an unknown number.

⚖️ PECA 2016 Compliant 🚫 No Stranger Lookup — Anywhere 🔒 Self-Check Methods Only ✅ PTA-Published Codes 🗓️ Last Reviewed: 30 August 2026

Fact card: no legal tool can reveal a stranger's name from their mobile number, PECA 2016 Section 16 applies — No legal tool in Pakistan can return a stranger’s name from their mobile number.

At a Glance

Key takeaways — sim owner name checks in 30 seconds

The short version: you cannot legally check a stranger’s SIM owner name by mobile number in Pakistan, full stop — but you can check your own SIM records fully and legally in under a minute.

No app, website, or SMS code in Pakistan can legally return a stranger’s name, address, or CNIC from their mobile number — there is no public PTA or NADRA API that any developer has access to.
Dialling 667 and typing “MNP” only ever shows details of the SIM sending that message — your own name, a partly masked CNIC, IMSI, activation date, and connection type. It cannot be pointed at someone else’s number.
Texting N plus any 11-digit number to 76367 tells you which network that number is on — Jazz, Zong, Telenor, or Ufone — and absolutely nothing else.
Apps on the Play Store calling themselves “SIM Owner Details,” “Pak SIM Database,” or similar are not connected to PTA or NADRA in any way; several say so themselves, in their own descriptions.
Using or paying for a service that claims to reveal someone else’s identity from their number risks prosecution under PECA 2016, Section 16 — up to 3 years in prison, a fine of up to Rs 5,000,000, or both.
Only a police officer or investigation agency acting under a formal PECA 2016 investigation — governed by the Investigation Rules 2018 — can lawfully require an operator to hand over a specific person’s subscriber information. It is not a service the public can request or pay for.
If the real problem is a harassing or unknown caller, the lawful route is a complaint filed with PTA — through its official complaint portal or its RAABTA WhatsApp assistant (0315-0055055) — or an NCCIA cybercrime report (1799), not a name lookup.
What you can fully and legally check is your own identity: run a complete SIM owner details online check on your own CNIC via 668 or the free portal cnic.sims.pk.

The Reality Check

How to find SIM owner name and address — the honest answer

You cannot find a stranger’s SIM owner name and address from their mobile number through any legal public channel in Pakistan — PTA does not operate a public name-and-address lookup, and no such database is open to app developers or website owners.

This is the single most-searched question on this entire topic, and it deserves a direct answer rather than a vague one. People typing “how can I check who owns a SIM number” are usually trying to solve a real problem — an unknown caller, a suspicious WhatsApp message, a missed-call scam, a number that keeps texting them — and they assume, reasonably, that somewhere a lookup tool must exist because the phone system clearly “knows” who owns every SIM. It does. The Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) and mobile operators maintain that record internally, tied to each subscriber’s CNIC under the biometric verification system that has been in force since 2015. But that internal record was never opened to the public as a name lookup, for the same reason your own bank does not let strangers type in your account number and see your balance: it is regulated personal data, and PECA 2016 makes unauthorised use of someone else’s identity information a criminal offence.

What actually exists are four narrow, self-check tools, and understanding exactly what each one covers — and does not cover — is the whole answer to “how can I check who owns a SIM number.”

Every real SMS/USSD channel in Pakistan’s SIM system, and exactly whose details it reveals
Code / tool	What you send	Whose details come back	Contains a name?	Cost
668 (SMS)	Your own 13-digit CNIC, no dashes	Yours — an operator-wise count of SIMs on your CNIC	No — counts only, no names	About Rs 2 incl. tax
cnic.sims.pk	Your own CNIC or NICOP/POC number	Yours — the same counts, on screen	No — counts only, no names	Free
667 “MNP” (SMS)	The word MNP, from the SIM in question	The sending SIM’s own record — self-check only	Yes — but only your own registered name	Standard SMS rate
76367 (SMS)	“N” + any 11-digit number	That number’s current network only	No — network label only, never a name	Rs 2 + tax

Notice the pattern: three of the four channels never show a name at all, and the one that does — 667 — only ever shows the name attached to the SIM that physically sends the SMS. There is no fifth channel, no hidden PTA endpoint, and no NADRA portal that takes a stranger’s number as input and returns their identity. If you want to check SIM owner details online for compliance or curiosity about how many connections sit on an identity, the only identity that channel can legally serve is your own.

It is worth being blunt about why this gap frustrates people: globally, most countries with SIM registration draw the same line Pakistan does — the subscriber database exists for regulatory, law-enforcement, and billing purposes, not for public reverse lookups. Treat any claim otherwise, from any site or app, as false by default.

There is also a reason this exact search — “check sim owner name by mobile number” and its many variations — has become one of the fastest-growing queries in Pakistan’s telecom space. As missed-call scams, WhatsApp impersonation, fake courier and delivery texts, and one-ring “wrong number” calls have all increased, more people are, understandably, reaching for the most obvious-sounding fix: identify the caller. The demand is real and growing; the supply of a legal way to meet it, however, has not changed, because the underlying law has not changed. Every result promising otherwise is either repeating the same myth, or actively operating outside PECA 2016.

It also helps to separate two different searches that get lumped together: “mobile number details with owner name and address” and “mobile number detail with name and address” both describe the same non-existent capability, whether phrased as a single word, two words, or with an ampersand. No punctuation or phrasing variation unlocks a different, hidden tool — the answer is identical across every version of the question: it does not exist as a public, legal service in Pakistan, regardless of how the search is worded.

Get This One Right

What 667 (MNP) actually shows — and the one thing it never does

Sending the word “MNP” to 667 shows you only the registered details of the SIM that sends that message — your own name, a partly masked CNIC, your IMSI, activation date, and connection type — and it can never be used to look up someone else’s number.

This is the code most misunderstood on the entire internet right now, including by several AI chat assistants that answer this question incorrectly. So we are going to be extremely precise. The Mobile Number Portability (MNP) self-check, reached by texting MNP to 667, was built by operators so a subscriber could confirm their own SIM’s registration status before switching networks — a routine, everyday self-service query. The reply arrives on the same handset, and it describes the SIM currently inserted in that handset. Nothing about the process lets you substitute someone else’s mobile number for your own.

What the reply actually contains

The registered name on the sending SIM’s own connection
A partly masked version of the CNIC that SIM is registered against
The IMSI (a technical SIM identifier, not a phone number)
The date that specific connection was activated
Whether the connection is a voice, data, or hybrid type

What it can never do

You cannot open your own messaging app, type someone else’s 11-digit mobile number into a text box, send it to 667, and receive that person’s name. The 667 short code does not accept a phone number as an input at all — it responds to the keyword “MNP” and identifies the sender from the network signalling of the SIM in the handset, the same way a phone call carries caller ID. There is no field, no format, no alternate keyword, and no “trick” that redirects the query to a different number. Any article, video, or forum post claiming you can “text 667 with someone’s number to get their name” is describing a feature that does not exist.

Common confusion: people conflate 667 with a directory lookup because the reply contains a name. It does — but only the name on the SIM that sent the SMS. If your friend’s SIM sends MNP to 667, your friend sees their own name, never yours, and you would never see theirs by texting from your own phone.

This distinction matters legally, not just technically. Because 667 is a genuine self-check tool sanctioned for subscriber use, it is completely lawful to use on your own number. The moment anyone frames it as a way to identify a stranger — even hypothetically, even “in theory if you had their SIM” — the framing itself is false, because the code has no mechanism to interrogate a number you do not hold.

Network Only, Nothing Else

What 76367 tells you about any number — and what it deliberately withholds

Texting N followed by an 11-digit mobile number to 76367 (about Rs 2 plus tax) tells you which network that number currently belongs to — Jazz, Zong, Telenor, or Ufone — and nothing about who owns it.

This is a genuinely useful, genuinely legal tool, and it deserves its own explanation because people often stumble onto it while searching for “mobile number details with owner name and address” and mistake it for a name lookup. It is not one, by design. Because so many numbers have been ported between networks under Mobile Number Portability since it launched in Pakistan, the visible prefix (03xx) no longer reliably tells you which operator a number sits on today. 76367 solves exactly that narrow problem — nothing more.

How to use it

Open your SMS app and compose a new message to 76367.
Type the letter N, a space, then the full 11-digit number, e.g. N 03001234567.
Send it. Standard rates apply — roughly Rs 2 plus tax per query.
The reply names only the current network of that number. That is the entire response.

No name. No CNIC. No address. No activation date. No location, city, or district. If you ever see a screenshot online claiming 76367 returned a name, either the image has been edited or the person is describing a different, unofficial service falsely piggy-backing on the same short code format. Treat the real 76367 as a network-identification tool only, useful for knowing which operator’s helpline to call about a number, and nothing beyond that.

Why the Apps Fail

Which app shows SIM owner details? None that are genuine — here is why

No app on the Play Store or App Store legitimately shows SIM owner details from a mobile number, because no public PTA or NADRA API exists for any developer to connect to — several of these apps say exactly that in their own store descriptions.

“Which app shows SIM owner details?” and “is there a real Pak SIM Owner Details app?” are two of the most common follow-up searches after someone fails to find a working website. The honest answer is structural, not a matter of finding the right app: PTA has never published, licensed, or opened a subscriber-lookup API to third-party developers. Without that API, there is no legitimate technical path for any app to return a name, address, or CNIC from a number you type in. What these apps typically do instead falls into a small number of patterns.

How the “owner lookup” apps actually work (or don’t)

Self-disclaiming apps: a number of apps carrying names like “SIM Owner Details” or “Pak Number Tracker” state plainly in their own Play Store descriptions that they are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sourced from any government or operator database — a direct admission that whatever they show is not authoritative.
Stale, unverifiable data: some apps pull from old telemarketing lists, crowd-sourced caller-ID contributions, or outdated leaked datasets that predate the 2015 biometric re-verification drive. None of this is a real owner lookup: a name lifted from an old list is never checked against any current, authoritative record, so it tells you nothing reliable about who holds the number today — treat anything these apps display as unverified and untrustworthy by default, not as a real answer.
Ad-and-permission harvesters: a common pattern is an app that asks for contacts, call-log, and location permissions up front, shows heavy advertising, and ultimately returns nothing usable — the “lookup” screen is the bait, the permissions are the product.
Fabricated results: the least honest category simply generates a plausible-looking but entirely invented name and city for any number entered, banking on the searcher having no way to verify it against a real record.

Look-alike warning: only cnic.sims.pk is the official PTA self-check portal, and it only ever accepts your own CNIC to show your own SIM count — it has no owner-by-number search box. Sound-alike domains, browser extensions, and WhatsApp “bots” offering a name-by-number search are not PTA services and should never receive your CNIC, your contacts, or a payment.

If an app or site ever asks you to pay a small fee “to unlock” a stranger’s name and address, that payment is the entire business model — the data behind it, when anything is shown at all, is not coming from a lawful source.

Draw the Line

Sim owner name check: what you can legally do, and what to avoid entirely

You can legally run a full sim owner name check only on your own identity — via 668, 667, or cnic.sims.pk — and you must avoid every site, app, or paid service that claims to reveal a stranger’s name from their number.

✅ You CAN (legal & safe)

Text your own 13-digit CNIC to 668 for a per-operator SIM count on your identity
Run the same check for free, worldwide, at cnic.sims.pk using your CNIC or NICOP/POC
Text MNP to 667 from your own SIM to see your own registered name, masked CNIC, and activation date
Text N [number] to 76367 to identify which network any number currently sits on
File a harassment or fraud report with PTA or NCCIA when an unknown number is the actual problem
Run the complete SIM owner details online check on your own CNIC if you suspect an unauthorised SIM is registered in your name

🚫 You must AVOID (illegal / risky)

“Sim owner name by mobile number” websites and Telegram/WhatsApp bots — PECA 2016, Section 16
Apps claiming a “live PTA/NADRA database” connection — no such public database exists
Paying anyone to “unlock” a stranger’s name, address, or CNIC from a number
Typing someone else’s number into the 667 or 76367 flow expecting a name — both are self-check or network-only tools
Sharing your own CNIC with any site other than the official cnic.sims.pk portal
Attempting to track a caller’s home address or live location yourself — that is not a lawful, public capability at all

The Law, Precisely

PECA 2016: the exact penalty for pursuing someone’s identity without authorisation

Under Section 16 of the Pakistan Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) 2016, obtaining or using another person’s identity information without their authorisation is a criminal offence punishable by up to 3 years’ imprisonment, a fine of up to Rs 5,000,000, or both.

This is not a vague warning — it is the specific legal exposure created the moment a “find the owner” search moves from curiosity into actually obtaining a person’s identity information without their consent, including via a third-party tool that scrapes or resells subscriber data. The offence under Section 16 attaches to the unauthorised obtaining or use of that identity information itself, with no requirement to prove a further motive such as fraud — which is exactly why Pakistan’s cybercrime law treats subscriber identity as protected personal data, not an open lookup field.

What the law prohibits: obtaining, using, transmitting, selling, or facilitating access to another identifiable person’s name, CNIC, address, or other identity information tied to a mobile number, without that person’s authorisation, is an offence under PECA 2016, Section 16, carrying up to 3 years’ imprisonment, a fine of up to Rs 5,000,000, or both. This applies whether the identity information is obtained directly, through an app, through a paid “lookup” service, or by asking a third party to check on your behalf. There is no personal-curiosity, journalistic, or “I just wanted to know” exemption written into the statute.

The practical implication for anyone searching “how to know the sim owner name” for a specific person is straightforward: even successfully using an illegal service does not put you in a safer position — it places you inside the same exposure as the operator of that service, because the offence attaches to the unauthorised use of the identity information, not only to the party that first collected it. That risk applies regardless of the underlying motive, whether it is suspicion of an affair, a dispute over money, harassment by an unknown number, or simple nosiness.

Where the Line Actually Sits

What only law enforcement can do — and why it is not a public service

Only a police officer or an investigation agency, acting within a formal investigation under PECA 2016 and the Investigation Rules 2018, may lawfully require a mobile operator to disclose a specific person’s subscriber information — and this authority cannot be requested, hired, or paid for by a member of the public.

It is important to state this accurately rather than leave the impression that a determined enough person could somehow access the same channel. PECA 2016, read together with the Investigation Rules 2018, empowers a designated investigation officer to formally require a service provider to produce specified subscriber data when that data is relevant to a person under active criminal investigation — for example, in a case of financial fraud, blackmail, terrorism-related activity, or serious harassment that has already been reported and registered as a case. That process runs through the investigating agency’s legal channel to the operator’s compliance department, is documented, and is tied to a specific, already-opened case file.

That is the entirety of what “law enforcement can check a number” means in practice. It does not mean:

A private citizen can pay a police contact, agent, or “source” to run an informal check on a number
A lawyer, private investigator, or consultancy can obtain the same disclosure outside a registered criminal case
The process can be initiated by simply wanting to know who owns a number, without a filed and accepted complaint that meets the threshold for investigation
Any shortcut, contact, or “connection” can substitute for the documented legal procedure

If you have genuinely been the victim of a crime — extortion, blackmail, financial fraud, or serious harassment — the correct step is to file a formal complaint with the NCCIA, which can then decide, under its own legal authority, whether the case meets the threshold for a subscriber-information request to an operator. That is categorically different from asking around for “how to find sim owner name and address” as a personal favour.

People sometimes ask whether a friend or relative “in the police” or “in telecom” can informally run a check as a favour. Even where an individual officer or operator employee has technical access to subscriber systems for their own job, using that access outside an official, documented case file is itself an unauthorised disclosure — exposing that person, not just the requester, to liability under PECA 2016. There is no informal, off-the-books version of this process that is actually lawful; a favour done this way is a violation committed by two people instead of one.

What You Should Actually Do

The lawful path: dealing with an unknown or harassing number

If an unknown number is calling, texting, or harassing you, the lawful and effective response is to block the number, report it to PTA through its official complaint channels or to the NCCIA on 1799, and check your own identity record — not to search for the caller’s name.

Almost everyone who searches “sim owner name by mobile number” is trying to solve one of a handful of real, understandable problems: a stranger keeps calling at odd hours, a number is sending threatening or abusive messages, a missed-call or lottery-scam text keeps arriving, or someone suspects a family member’s number is being misused. None of these problems actually require knowing the caller’s legal name — they require the harassment to stop and, where a crime has occurred, for the right authority to act on it.

Step-by-step: what actually resolves the situation

Block the number directly on your phone — this stops the immediate nuisance instantly and costs nothing.
Screenshot the evidence — the calling number, timestamps, and full content of any messages, before blocking, so you have a record if you escalate.
Report harassment or a suspicious number to PTA through its official complaint portal (complaint.pta.gov.pk) or its RAABTA WhatsApp assistant at 0315-0055055 — this puts a spam, robocall, or unauthorised-marketing complaint in front of the regulator through a documented channel.
Report cybercrime — threats, blackmail, financial fraud — to the NCCIA on its 24/7 helpline 1799, launched 3 June 2025 after the agency took over cybercrime investigation from FIA’s Cybercrime Wing in April 2025. Do not use the old FIA number “1991” — it is retired and incorrect.
If the case is serious — extortion, stalking, financial loss — file a written complaint so the NCCIA can open a formal investigation; only at that stage can subscriber information be lawfully requested from the operator, by the agency itself.
Check your own SIM record if you suspect identity misuse on your own CNIC, using our SIM owner details self-check guide, or run the full SIM owner details online check to confirm every SIM under your CNIC is one you recognise.

PTA also runs a WhatsApp self-service assistant called RAABTA (its internal formal name is the PTA Digital Assistant), reachable at 0315-0055055 since its 26 February 2026 launch, which can guide you through filing a complaint or general telecom queries — it is a guidance and complaint-filing tool, not a lookup service, and it will not return anyone’s name either.

The uncomfortable but important truth is this: wanting to identify a specific stranger from their number is a completely different goal from wanting the harassment to stop, and only the second goal has a real, legal, working solution in Pakistan today. Checking SIM owner details on your own identity, reporting bad actors through the correct channel, and letting a registered investigation run its legal course are the only paths that actually lead somewhere.

One more practical note worth adding here: your phone’s own tools quietly help more than most people realise. Most Android and iOS handsets can flag likely spam or scam numbers automatically once caller-ID and spam-protection features are switched on in the phone’s settings, drawing on aggregated report patterns rather than any private identity database — this is a very different, privacy-respecting mechanism from a name-by-number lookup, and it is worth enabling even though, again, it will show a spam-likelihood label rather than a legal name.

Roman-Urdu mein samjhein: Bohat log Google pe “sim owner name by mobile number” is liye search karte hain kyunke unhein lagta hai shayad koi app ya website kisi bhi number ka naam bata degi. Sachai yeh hai: Pakistan mein aisi koi legal cheez maujood nahi jo kisi ajnabi ke number se uska naam, address, ya CNIC nikaal kar de — na koi SMS code, na koi website, na cnic.sims.pk. Jo cheezein waqai kaam karti hain woh sirf apni khud ki identity check karne ke liye hain: 668 pe apna CNIC bhejein ya cnic.sims.pk pe check karein, to pata chalega ke aapke CNIC pe kitni SIMs registered hain. 667 pe “MNP” likh kar bhejna sirf uss SIM ka record dikhata hai jo message bhej rahi ho — iska matlab yeh nahi ke aap kisi doosre ke number ko type karke unka naam nikaal sakte hain, aisa bilkul mumkin nahi hai. Isi tarah 76367 par “N” likh kar number bhejne se sirf yeh pata chalta hai ke woh number kis network (Jazz, Zong, Telenor, ya Ufone) ka hai — naam kabhi nahi aata. Play Store ki jo apps “SIM Owner Details” ka naam le kar aati hain, unme se aksar khud apni description mein likhti hain ke unka koi sarkari database se taalluq nahi. Agar koi aapko kisi ajnabi ka naam CNIC ke sath dene ka wada kare, chahe paisa maang kar ya free mein, samajh lein ke yeh ghair-qanooni hai — PECA 2016 Section 16 ke tehat 3 saal tak qaid aur 50 lakh rupay tak jurmana ho sakta hai. Behtar yeh hai ke apni khud ki SIM details verify karein, aur agar koi number tang kar raha hai to PTA ke complaint portal ya RAABTA WhatsApp (0315-0055055) ke zariye, ya phir NCCIA (1799) par report karein — yehi tareeqa asal mein kaam karta hai.

Straight Answers

Frequently asked questions

How can I check sim owner name by mobile number in Pakistan?

You cannot legally check a stranger’s sim owner name by mobile number in Pakistan — no public PTA, NADRA, or third-party tool offers this. You can only check your own registration: text your CNIC to 668, use cnic.sims.pk, or send “MNP” to 667 from your own SIM.

How to find SIM owner name and address?

There is no legal way to find a stranger’s SIM owner name and address from their number — PTA has never published a public lookup for this, and any site or app claiming otherwise is not connected to an official database. Only a registered criminal investigation can lawfully obtain that information.

How can I check who owns a SIM number?

You cannot check who owns someone else’s SIM number as a member of the public. You can only verify your own SIMs via 668 or cnic.sims.pk, or confirm your own SIM’s registration by texting “MNP” to 667 from that SIM. Ownership checks on other people’s numbers require a formal police investigation.

Does 667 show the name of any number I type in?

No. Texting “MNP” to 667 only ever shows the registered name, masked CNIC, and activation date of the SIM that sends the message — it does not accept a phone number as input, so it can never reveal the name behind someone else’s number.

Which app shows SIM owner details?

No genuine app shows a stranger’s SIM owner details, because PTA has never opened a public subscriber-lookup API. Apps using names like “SIM Owner Details” often state in their own descriptions that they have no government or operator data connection — treat any results from them as unverified or fabricated.

Is there a real Pak SIM Owner Details app?

No. There is no officially recognised “Pak SIM Owner Details” app backed by PTA or NADRA. The only official self-check tool is the web portal cnic.sims.pk, and it only returns a SIM count for the CNIC you enter yourself — it has no owner-by-number search feature at all.

What does 76367 actually tell you about a mobile number?

Sending “N” plus an 11-digit number to 76367 (about Rs 2 plus tax) tells you only which network — Jazz, Zong, Telenor, or Ufone — that number currently belongs to. It never returns a name, CNIC, address, or location, regardless of whose number you enter.

What happens if I use a site that promises to reveal a SIM owner’s name?

You risk prosecution under PECA 2016, Section 16, for obtaining or using another person’s identity information without authorisation — up to 3 years’ imprisonment, a fine of up to Rs 5,000,000, or both. This applies even if the site is the one collecting the data, not just distributing it.

Can the police tell me who owns a mobile number if I ask them?

Not on informal request. A police officer or investigation agency may require an operator to disclose a specific person’s subscriber information only within a formal investigation opened under PECA 2016 and the Investigation Rules 2018 — it is not a service the public can request or pay for directly.

Someone is harassing me from an unknown number — what should I actually do?

Block the number, screenshot the evidence, and report it. File a complaint with PTA through its official complaint portal or its RAABTA WhatsApp assistant (0315-0055055) for spam or unauthorised marketing, or contact the NCCIA cyber helpline 1799 for threats, blackmail, or fraud. A registered complaint, not a name lookup, is what allows any real action to follow.

How to know the sim owner name of my own connections?

Text your 13-digit CNIC (no dashes) to 668, or enter it at cnic.sims.pk. Note that both return an operator-wise count of SIMs on your CNIC, not names attached to each SIM — for your own registered name specifically, text “MNP” to 667 from that particular SIM.

Why doesn’t PTA just build a public sim owner name lookup tool?

Subscriber identity data is protected personal information under Pakistani law. Opening it to public search-by-number would let anyone identify any stranger at will, directly conflicting with PECA 2016’s protections against unauthorised use of another person’s identity information — so no such public tool exists or is planned.

Written and reviewed by Muhammad Hayan — Pakistan telecom & digital-identity specialist (PTA policy, PECA 2016, NADRA biometric verification). Last reviewed: 30 August 2026.

Facts on this page trace to: PTA (pta.gov.pk, cnic.sims.pk, complaint.pta.gov.pk) and its published verification-code and RAABTA/PTA Digital Assistant information (RAABTA launched 26 February 2026); the Pakistan Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) 2016, Section 16, and the Investigation Rules 2018; the NCCIA (complaint.nccia.gov.pk, 24/7 helpline 1799, operational since 3 June 2025, having taken over cybercrime investigation from FIA’s Cybercrime Wing in April 2025); and operator-published short-code documentation for 667 (MNP) and 76367.